Close

§3.1 Liability of Operator

§3.1 Liability of Operator

The Case: Loope v. Goodings Million Dollar Midways, Inc. , 553 S.W. 2d 573 (Tenn. 1977).

The Basic Facts: Female Plaintiff received an electrical shock while attempting to board a midway ride at the Knox County Fair. Defendant appealed a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff and her husband.

The Bottom Line:

  • "[Ride operator] owed the highest degree of care to its patrons, or that degree of care which the most prudent person would be expected to exercise in the maintenance, inspection and repair of such equipment." 553 S.W. 2d at 574.
  • "[C]onduct by one charged only with ordinary care might amount to simple negligence, but when done by a person charged with a higher degree of care, such as a common carrier or a supplier of electricity, that same conduct could amount to gross negligence or to willful and wanton conduct justifying an award of punitive damages." Id. at 575.

Other Sources of Note: The Loope Court cited with approval the decision in Lyons v. Wagers, 404 S.W.2d 770 (Tenn. Ct. .App. 1966). The Lyons Court stated "that the operator of an amusement ride owes his patrons the same degree of care owed by a common carrier to its passengers, which is 'the highest degree of care - that care which the most prudent man would be expected to exercise under circumstances similar to those shown in evidence, in the design, construction, maintenance, inspection, and repair of his vehicle and its approaches and exits.'" Id. at 274.

There is an extensive discussion of the liability of the property owner (as distinguished from the ride operator) in Lyons. Readers who are researching the liability of a property owner may wish to review the discussion of this issue in the Lyons opinion. There is not a separate section addressing the liability of the property owner because of the substantial changes in premises liability law in Tennessee since 1966 and because there are no decisions that discuss the issue since the law has changed .

There are numerous statutes that address the business of amusement rides. They are codified at Tenn. Code Ann.§ 68-121-101, et seq.


Client Reviews
★★★★★
Everything was great. You guys are a great representative. I was satisfied with everything. Truly appreciate John Day and his hard-working staff. Jamar Gibson
★★★★★
We thought that you did an excellent job in representing us in our lawsuit. We would recommend you to anyone. Mitch Deese
★★★★★
The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. is, without a doubt, the best in Nashville! They treated me with the utmost respect and tended to my every need. No question went unanswered. I was always kept informed of every step in the process. I received phenomenal results; I couldn't ask for more. I would definitely hire The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. again. Anthony Santiago
★★★★★
I would definitely recommend to anyone to hire John Day's law firm because everyone was helpful, made everything clear and got the job done. I am satisfied with how my case was handled. June Keomahavong
★★★★★
It's been a long battle but this firm has been very efficient and has done a remarkable job for me! I highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistance. Everyone has always been very kind and kept me informed of all actions promptly. Linda Bush
★★★★★
I had a great experience with the Law Offices of John Day. The staff was very accommodating, and my phone calls/emails were always responded to in a timely manner. They made the entire process very easy and stress-free for me, and I had confidence that my case was in good hands. I am very happy with the results, and I highly recommend! Casey Hutchinson
Contact Us
Live Chat