The following section from Day on Torts Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law​​​ is out of date and should not be used. It remains a part of this site for historical purposes only. An updated version of the book is available by subscription at (Additional information below.)

Chapter 48: Misrepresentation by Concealment

§48.1 Generally

The Case: Body Invest, LLC. v. Cone Solvents, LLC, No. M2006-01723-COA-R3-CV,2007 WL 2198230 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 26, 2007).

The Basic Facts: Plaintiffs filed suit against defendant for allegedly supplying it with contaminated components that plaintiffs used in tanning products.

The Bottom Line:

  • "[M]isrepresentation by concealment requires a plaintiff to prove the following elements: (1) the defendant concealed or misrepresented a material fact; (2) the defendant was under a duty to disclose the fact to the plaintiff; (3) the defendant intentionally concealed or suppressed the fact with the intent to deceive the plaintiff; (4) the plaintiff was not aware of the fact and would have acted differently if the plaintiff knew of the concealed or suppressed fact; and, (5) as a result of the concealment or suppression of the fact, the plaintiff sustained damage. T.P.I. 3-CIVIL 8.38; Lonning v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc., 725 S.W.2d 682, 685 (Tenn. Ct. App.1986)." 2007 WL 2198230 at *6.

Other Sources of Note: Cf. Rentea v. Rose , No. M2006-02076-COA-R3-CV, 2008 WL 1850911 (Tenn. Ct. App. Apr. 25, 2008) (mere silence is not enough; concealment may consist [of] withholding information asked for, or in making use of some device to mislead, thus involving act and intention); Lonning V. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. 725 S.W.2d 682 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1986) (for concealment or non-disclosure to constitute fraud, the defendant must have had knowledge of an existing fact or condition and a duty to disclose the fact or condition; a party to a contract has a duty to disclose to the other party any material fact affecting the essence of the subject matter of the contract, unless ordinary diligence would have revealed the undisclosed fact).

Recent Cases: Odom v. Oliver , No. W2008-01145-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 691879 (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2009) (reversing summary judgment finding sellers did not show buyers could not prove essential element of causation at trial); Rural Developments, LLC v. Tucker, No. M2008-00172-COA-R3-CV, 2009 WL 112541 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2009) (affirming partial summary judgment dismissing intentional misrepresentation claim on different grounds than trial court finding no reasonable reliance); Orndorff v. Calahan, No. M2007-02060-COA-R3-CV, 2008 WL 4613546 (Tenn. Ct. App. Oct. 9, 2008) (upholding trial court's findings that plaintiffs' reasonably relied on representations by defendants).

After an accident, many injury victims and their families want more information on the accident and their legal rights. Consequently, many of them have found their way to these pages. While we are happy you are here, please understand Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law was written to be a quick, invaluable reference for Tennessee tort lawyers. While the book provides the leading case for more than 300 tort law subjects and thousands of related case citations, it is not a substitute for personalized legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Rather than researching these legal issues alone, we urge you to contact one of our award-winning lawyers who can sit down with you, review your case, answer your questions and clearly explain your rights and your options in a no-cost, no-obligation consultation. Our experienced attorneys handle all personal injury and wrongful death cases on a contingency basis, so we only get paid if we win. If for any reason you are unable to come to our office, we will gladly come to you.

To schedule an appointment, contact us online or call us at 615-742-4880 or toll-free at 866.812.8787.

The foregoing is an excerpt from Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law, published by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, recipient of Best Lawyers in America recognition, Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated attorney, and Top 100 Tennessee Mid-South Super Lawyers designee. Read John’s full bio here.

The book is now available electronically by subscription at The new format allows us to keep the book current as new opinions are released. BirdDog Law also has John's Tennessee Law of Civil Trial and Compendium of Tennessee Tort Reform Statutes available by subscription, as well as multiple free resources to help Tennessee lawyers serve their clients

Client Reviews
Everything was great. You guys are a great representative. I was satisfied with everything. Truly appreciate John Day and his hard-working staff. Jamar Gibson
We thought that you did an excellent job in representing us in our lawsuit. We would recommend you to anyone. Mitch Deese
The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. is, without a doubt, the best in Nashville! They treated me with the utmost respect and tended to my every need. No question went unanswered. I was always kept informed of every step in the process. I received phenomenal results; I couldn't ask for more. I would definitely hire The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. again. Anthony Santiago
I would definitely recommend to anyone to hire John Day's law firm because everyone was helpful, made everything clear and got the job done. I am satisfied with how my case was handled. June Keomahavong
It's been a long battle but this firm has been very efficient and has done a remarkable job for me! I highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistance. Everyone has always been very kind and kept me informed of all actions promptly. Linda Bush
I had a great experience with the Law Offices of John Day. The staff was very accommodating, and my phone calls/emails were always responded to in a timely manner. They made the entire process very easy and stress-free for me, and I had confidence that my case was in good hands. I am very happy with the results, and I highly recommend! Casey Hutchinson