The following section from Day on Torts Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law​​​ is out of date and should not be used. It remains a part of this site for historical purposes only. An updated version of the book is available by subscription at (Additional information below.)

§49.11 Police Reports

The Case: Youngblood v. Solomon , No. 03A01-9601-CV-00037, 1996 WL 310015 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 11, 1996).

The Basic Facts: This is in action for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. After a verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed challenging the trial court's introduction of a police officer's report concerning the accident.

The Bottom Line:

  • "The introduction of the police report is proscribed by T.C.A. § 55-10-114(b) which provides in pertinent part as follows:
    (b) No reports or information in this section shall be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal, arising out of an accident, except that the department shall furnish upon demand of any party to such trial, or upon demand of any court, a certificate showing that a specified accident report has or has not been made to the department in compliance with the law."
    1996 WL 310015 at *1.
  • "There are no exceptions in the statute for introduction of a report as evidence in any manner and we are not inclined to create one. It has been held that an officer's report may be used for the purpose of refreshing the officer's memory. See Lee v. Shipp (Tenn. App. Opinion filed September 11, 1985). See also Tennessee Rules of Evidence, Rule 803(5), relating to refreshment of a witness' recollection. It would appear that Rule 803(5) would make the police report admissible absent the statutory prohibition. We are of the opinion, however, that the statutory prohibition against admission must prevail. See Rule 101, Tennessee Rules of Evidence and McBee v. Williams, 405 S.W.2d 6678 (Tenn. App. 1966). McBee expressly holds that the question of admissibility of such [accident] reports is controlled by T.C.A. § 59-1014 [now T.C.A. § 55-10-114]. We agree with McBee and hold that police reports prepared and filed pursuant to T.C.A. § 55-10-114 are inadmissible as evidence and the admission of the of the [sic] report in this case was error." Id. (footnote omitted).

Other Sources of Note: Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-10-114; Tenn. R. Evid. 803(8).

After an accident, many injury victims and their families want more information on the accident and their legal rights. Consequently, many of them have found their way to these pages. While we are happy you are here, please understand Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law was written to be a quick, invaluable reference for Tennessee tort lawyers. While the book provides the leading case for more than 300 tort law subjects and thousands of related case citations, it is not a substitute for personalized legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Rather than researching these legal issues alone, we urge you to contact one of our award-winning lawyers who can sit down with you, review your case, answer your questions and clearly explain your rights and your options in a no-cost, no-obligation consultation. Our experienced attorneys handle all personal injury and wrongful death cases on a contingency basis, so we only get paid if we win. If for any reason you are unable to come to our office, we will gladly come to you.

To schedule an appointment, contact us online or call us at 615-742-4880 or toll-free at 866.812.8787.

The foregoing is an excerpt from Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law, published by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, recipient of Best Lawyers in America recognition, Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated attorney, and Top 100 Tennessee Mid-South Super Lawyers designee. Read John’s full bio here.

The book is now available electronically by subscription at The new format allows us to keep the book current as new opinions are released. BirdDog Law also has John's Tennessee Law of Civil Trial and Compendium of Tennessee Tort Reform Statutes available by subscription, as well as multiple free resources to help Tennessee lawyers serve their clients

Client Reviews
Everything was great. You guys are a great representative. I was satisfied with everything. Truly appreciate John Day and his hard-working staff. Jamar Gibson
We thought that you did an excellent job in representing us in our lawsuit. We would recommend you to anyone. Mitch Deese
The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. is, without a doubt, the best in Nashville! They treated me with the utmost respect and tended to my every need. No question went unanswered. I was always kept informed of every step in the process. I received phenomenal results; I couldn't ask for more. I would definitely hire The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. again. Anthony Santiago
I would definitely recommend to anyone to hire John Day's law firm because everyone was helpful, made everything clear and got the job done. I am satisfied with how my case was handled. June Keomahavong
It's been a long battle but this firm has been very efficient and has done a remarkable job for me! I highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistance. Everyone has always been very kind and kept me informed of all actions promptly. Linda Bush
I had a great experience with the Law Offices of John Day. The staff was very accommodating, and my phone calls/emails were always responded to in a timely manner. They made the entire process very easy and stress-free for me, and I had confidence that my case was in good hands. I am very happy with the results, and I highly recommend! Casey Hutchinson