Picture of John Day

§47.6F Certificate of Good Faith - Ability to Take Voluntary Dismissal after Motion to Dismiss Has Been Filed

The Case: Davis v. Ibach, No. W2013-02514-COA-R3-CV, 2014 WL 3368847 (Tenn. Ct. App. July 9, 2014).

The Basic Facts: After filing his complaint, plaintiff timely filed a certificate of good faith, but failed to list that the executing party had zero violations of the statute. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff failed to comply with § 29-26-122, and after the trial court conducted a hearing on the motion but before the court ruled, plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, which the trial court granted.

The Bottom Line:

 

·      “The Defendants argued in their response that the trial court could not allow voluntary dismissal without prejudice of the Plaintiff’s claim because Section 29-26-122 requires dismissal with prejudice when the certificate of good faith does not comply with the statute. Because the certificate filed by the Plaintiff was plainly noncompliant with the statute, the Defendants argued, the trial court was without authority to allow a voluntary nonsuit without prejudice.” 2014 WL 3368847, at *1.

 

·       “The trial court in this case cited this Court’s holding in Robles as the primary basis for its decision. In Robles, the plaintiffs did not file a certificate of good faith at all, and the defendants filed a motion to dismiss on that basis. After the motion to dismiss was filed but before it was argued, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary nonsuit. Based on the notice of voluntary dismissal, the trial court entered a judgment dismissing the case without prejudice. Robles, 2011 WL 1532069, at *1.” Id. at *2.

 

·        “As in the instant case, the defendants in Robles argued that, because the dismissal for noncompliance of the statute had to be with prejudice, ‘allowing the plaintiffs to voluntarily dismiss the action without prejudice is contrary to the statutory mandate.’ Id. at *2. The appellate court disagreed. After discussing the interplay between Section 29-26-122 and Rule 41.01, the Robles court held that dismissal of the action ‘with prejudice’ based on the language of Section 29-26-122 ‘is not automatic.’ Id. at *3. It reasoned, ‘Nothing in the statute operates to prevent a plaintiff from exercising the right to voluntarily dismiss the action without prejudice.’ Id.Id.

 

·         Robles has not been abrogated, and nothing in the statute governing certificates of good faith precludes a plaintiff from exercising the ‘free and unrestricted’ right to dismiss an action without prejudice provided in Tenn. R. Civ. P. 41.01. Robles, 2011 WL 1532069, at *3. Thus, under Robles, we find no error in the trial court’s decision to permit the Plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss the case without prejudice under these circumstances.”  Id. at *4.

Recent Cases: Robles v. Vanderbilt Univ. Med. Center, No. M2010-01771-COA-R3-CV, 2011 WL 1532069 (Tenn. Ct. App. April 19, 2011) (allowing plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss after failing to file a certificate of good faith).

 

After an accident, many injury victims and their families want more information on the accident and their legal rights. Consequently, many of them have found their way to these pages. While we are happy you are here, please understand Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law was written to be a quick, invaluable reference for Tennessee tort lawyers. While the book provides the leading case for more than 300 tort law subjects and thousands of related case citations, it is not a substitute for personalized legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Rather than researching these legal issues alone, we urge you to contact one of our award-winning lawyers who can sit down with you, review your case, answer your questions and clearly explain your rights and your options in a no-cost, no-obligation consultation. Our experienced attorneys handle all personal injury and wrongful death cases on a contingency basis, so we only get paid if we win. If for any reason you are unable to come to our office, we will gladly come to you.

To schedule an appointment, contact us online or call us at 615-742-4880 or toll-free at 866-812-8787.



The foregoing is an excerpt from Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law, published by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, recipient of Best Lawyers in America recognition, Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated attorney, and Top 100 Tennessee Mid-South Super Lawyers designee. Read John’s full bio here.

To order a copy of the book, visit www.dayontortsbook.com. John also blogs regularly on key issues for tort lawyers. To subscribe to the Day on Torts blog, visit www.dayontorts.com.

Client Reviews
Everything was great. You guys are a great representative. I was satisfied with everything. Truly appreciate John Day and his hard-working staff.
★★★★★
We thought that you did an excellent job in representing us in our lawsuit. We would recommend you to anyone. Mitch Deese
★★★★★
The Law Offices of John Day is, without a doubt, the best in Nashville! They treated me with the utmost respect and tended to my every need. No question went unanswered. I was always kept informed of every step in the process. I received phenomenal results; I couldn't ask for more. I would definitely hire the Law Offices of John Day again. Anthony Santiago
★★★★★
I would definitely recommend to anyone to hire John Day's law firm because everyone was helpful, made everything clear and got the job done. I am satisfied with how my case was handled. June Keomahavong
★★★★★
It's been a long battle but this firm has been very efficient and has done a remarkable job for me! I highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistance. Everyone has always been very kind and kept me informed of all actions promptly. Linda Bush
★★★★★
I had a great experience with the Law Offices of John Day. The staff was very accommodating, and my phone calls/emails were always responded to in a timely manner. They made the entire process very easy and stress-free for me, and I had confidence that my case was in good hands. I am very happy with the results, and I highly recommend! Casey Hutchinson
★★★★★