Picture of John Day

§47.6D Certificate of Good Faith - No Requirement to File In Battery Claim

The Case:  Barnett v. Elite Sports Medicine, No. M2010-00619-COA-R3-CV, 2010 WL 5289669 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 17, 2010).

The Basic Facts:  Plaintiff filed a medical malpractice lawsuit before there was a duty to give notice or file a certificate of good faith.  See Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 29-26-121 (notice) and 122 (certificate of good faith).  She also alleged battery for failure to authorize the procedure.  She voluntarily dismissed the case and re-filed it after the 2009 versions of the statutes became effective.  She did not file a certificate of good faith with the second filing.  Defendant moved for a dismissal of the case. The trial judge granted the motion.

The Bottom Line:


·       “The cause of action to recover for a medical battery is premised on the patient’s failure to authorize or consent to a particular procedure. Blanchard v. Kellum, 975 S.W.2d 522, 524 (Tenn. 1998). A ‘simple inquiry’ to determine whether a case constitutes medical battery was set out in Blanchard as follows:


(1) was the patient aware that the doctor was going to perform the procedure (i.e., did the patient know that the dentist was going to perform a root canal on a specified tooth or that the doctor was going to perform surgery on a specified knee?); and, if so, (2) did the patient authorize performance of the procedure? A plaintiff’s cause of action may be classified as a medical battery only when answers to either of the above questions are in the negative. If, however, answers to the above questions are affirmative and if the plaintiff is alleging that the doctor failed to inform of any or all risks or aspects associated with a procedure, the patient’s cause of action rests on an informed consent theory.”


2010 WL 5289669, at *4.


·       “We disagree with Defendants’ contention that, under the allegations of the complaint, a certificate of good faith was required. The requirement to file a certificate of good faith is contained at Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-122(a) which states that the certificate is required ‘[i]n any medical malpractice action in which expert testimony is required by § 29-26-115.’ Expert testimony is not required to sustain a claim for medical battery inasmuch as the primary inquiry before the court is whether the patient knew of and authorized the procedure. Blanchard, 975 S.W.2d at 524.” Id. at *5.

After an accident, many injury victims and their families want more information on the accident and their legal rights. Consequently, many of them have found their way to these pages. While we are happy you are here, please understand Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law was written to be a quick, invaluable reference for Tennessee tort lawyers. While the book provides the leading case for more than 300 tort law subjects and thousands of related case citations, it is not a substitute for personalized legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Rather than researching these legal issues alone, we urge you to contact one of our award-winning lawyers who can sit down with you, review your case, answer your questions and clearly explain your rights and your options in a no-cost, no-obligation consultation. Our experienced attorneys handle all personal injury and wrongful death cases on a contingency basis, so we only get paid if we win. If for any reason you are unable to come to our office, we will gladly come to you.

To schedule an appointment, contact us online or call us at 615-742-4880 or toll-free at 866-812-8787.

The foregoing is an excerpt from Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law, published by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, recipient of Best Lawyers in America recognition, Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated attorney, and Top 100 Tennessee Mid-South Super Lawyers designee. Read John’s full bio here.

To order a copy of the book, visit www.dayontortsbook.com. John also blogs regularly on key issues for tort lawyers. To subscribe to the Day on Torts blog, visit www.dayontorts.com.

Client Reviews
Everything was great. You guys are a great representative. I was satisfied with everything. Truly appreciate John Day and his hard-working staff.
We thought that you did an excellent job in representing us in our lawsuit. We would recommend you to anyone. Mitch Deese
The Law Offices of John Day is, without a doubt, the best in Nashville! They treated me with the utmost respect and tended to my every need. No question went unanswered. I was always kept informed of every step in the process. I received phenomenal results; I couldn't ask for more. I would definitely hire the Law Offices of John Day again. Anthony Santiago
I would definitely recommend to anyone to hire John Day's law firm because everyone was helpful, made everything clear and got the job done. I am satisfied with how my case was handled. June Keomahavong
It's been a long battle but this firm has been very efficient and has done a remarkable job for me! I highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistance. Everyone has always been very kind and kept me informed of all actions promptly. Linda Bush
I had a great experience with the Law Offices of John Day. The staff was very accommodating, and my phone calls/emails were always responded to in a timely manner. They made the entire process very easy and stress-free for me, and I had confidence that my case was in good hands. I am very happy with the results, and I highly recommend! Casey Hutchinson