Picture of John Day

§47.40 Transitional Plaintiffs - 120-Day Extension Applied to Saving Statute for Transitional Plaintiffs

The Case:  Rajvongs v. Wright, 432 S.W.3d 808 (Tenn. 2013).

The Basic Facts: Initial health care liability action was filed before the pre-suit notice requirements were enacted, then plaintiff took voluntary nonsuit. Plaintiff refilled action after the effective date of the pre-suit notice requirement. Defendant moved for summary judgment on basis that second suit was not filed within one year saving statute; plaintiff asserted that he was entitled to 120-day extension of saving statute.  The Court ruled that plaintiff’s second action was commenced at the filing of his second complaint, not at the time he sent pre-suit notice to defendant.  432 S.W.3d at 811.

The Bottom Line:


·   “Mr. Rajvongs accordingly falls within the narrow category of plaintiffs who filed their initial complaints prior to the effective date of section 29-26-121, dismissed their original actions, and refilled their actions after the effective date of the statute. We therefore must determine whether these ‘transitional’ plaintiffs who gave pre-suit notice are entitled to the 120-day extension although their original statutes of limitation and repose have expired.” 432 S.W.3d at 813.


·       “We have long recognized that the saving statute is not a statute of limitations or a statute of repose and that it operates independently. …However, a transitional plaintiff is not necessarily precluded from receiving the 120-day extension simply because section 29-26-121(c) makes no explicit reference to the saving statute.” Id.


·        “We are unable to conclude that the General Assembly would require transitional plaintiffs to provide pre-suit notice before refilling under the saving statute and yet deprive such plaintiffs of the 120-day extension. Considering the statutory scheme it ins entirety, we can only conclude that a transitional plaintiff who properly provides pre-suit notice is entitled to the same procedural benefits that section 29-26-121(c) makes available to a plaintiff filing an initial health care liability complaint.” Id. at 814.


Recent Cases:  Cannon ex rel. Good v. Reddy, 428 S.W.3d 795 (Tenn. 2014) (plaintiff initially filed before pre-suit notice requirement was enacted, non-suited, then filed two consecutive actions after the requirement went into effect; second complaint did not comply with pre-suit notice and certificate of good faith requirements, but third complaint did; during pendency of appeal, plaintiff dismissed second complaint; Court held that this transitional plaintiff who properly gave pre-suit notice prior to filing third complaint was entitled to 120-day extension in which to re-file her complaint); Johnson v. Floyd, No. W2012-00207-COA-R3-CV, 2014 WL 476792 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 6, 2014) (saving statute extended by 120 days through compliance with pre-suit notice requirements).



After an accident, many injury victims and their families want more information on the accident and their legal rights. Consequently, many of them have found their way to these pages. While we are happy you are here, please understand Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law was written to be a quick, invaluable reference for Tennessee tort lawyers. While the book provides the leading case for more than 300 tort law subjects and thousands of related case citations, it is not a substitute for personalized legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Rather than researching these legal issues alone, we urge you to contact one of our award-winning lawyers who can sit down with you, review your case, answer your questions and clearly explain your rights and your options in a no-cost, no-obligation consultation. Our experienced attorneys handle all personal injury and wrongful death cases on a contingency basis, so we only get paid if we win. If for any reason you are unable to come to our office, we will gladly come to you.

To schedule an appointment, contact us online or call us at 615-742-4880 or toll-free at 866-812-8787.

The foregoing is an excerpt from Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law, published by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, recipient of Best Lawyers in America recognition, Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated attorney, and Top 100 Tennessee Mid-South Super Lawyers designee. Read John’s full bio here.

To order a copy of the book, visit www.dayontortsbook.com. John also blogs regularly on key issues for tort lawyers. To subscribe to the Day on Torts blog, visit www.dayontorts.com.

Client Reviews
Everything was great. You guys are a great representative. I was satisfied with everything. Truly appreciate John Day and his hard-working staff.
We thought that you did an excellent job in representing us in our lawsuit. We would recommend you to anyone. Mitch Deese
The Law Offices of John Day is, without a doubt, the best in Nashville! They treated me with the utmost respect and tended to my every need. No question went unanswered. I was always kept informed of every step in the process. I received phenomenal results; I couldn't ask for more. I would definitely hire the Law Offices of John Day again. Anthony Santiago
I would definitely recommend to anyone to hire John Day's law firm because everyone was helpful, made everything clear and got the job done. I am satisfied with how my case was handled. June Keomahavong
It's been a long battle but this firm has been very efficient and has done a remarkable job for me! I highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistance. Everyone has always been very kind and kept me informed of all actions promptly. Linda Bush
I had a great experience with the Law Offices of John Day. The staff was very accommodating, and my phone calls/emails were always responded to in a timely manner. They made the entire process very easy and stress-free for me, and I had confidence that my case was in good hands. I am very happy with the results, and I highly recommend! Casey Hutchinson