The following section from Day on Torts Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law​​​ is out of date and should not be used. It remains a part of this site for historical purposes only. An updated version of the book is available by subscription at (Additional information below.)

§30.3 Promissory Fraud

The Case: Stacks v. Saunders , 812 S.W.2d 587 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990).

The Basic Facts: Woman sought to set aside last will and testament of decedent alleging, inter alia, fraud and promissory fraud.

The Bottom Line:

  • "The plaintiff in this case also raised a claim against the defendant based on the tort of fraud. The basic elements for a fraud action are: (1) an intentional misrepresentation with regard to a material fact, Keith v. Murfreesboro Livestock Market, Inc., [780 S.W.2d 751 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1989)]; (2) knowledge of the representation falsity--that the representation was made 'knowingly' or 'without belief in its truth,' or 'recklessly' without regard to its truth or falsity, Tartera v. Palumbo, [453 S.W.2d 780, 782 (Tenn. 1970)]; (3) that the plaintiff reasonably relied on the misrepresentation and suffered damage, Holt v. American Progressive Life Ins. Co., 7[31 S.W.2d 923, 927 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1987)]; Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc., [546 S.W.2d 228, 232 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1976)]; and (4) that the misrepresentation relates to an existing or past fact, Haynes, 546 S.W.2d at 232, or, if the claim is based on promissory fraud, then the misrepresentation must 'embody a promise of future action without the present intention to carry out the promise,' Keith, [780 S.W.2d at 754 (citing Brungard v. Caprice Wreckers, Inc., 608 S.W.2d 585, 590 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980)]." 812 S.W.2d at 592.

  • "The fraud in this case is based upon the defendant's representation that he would cease his homosexual relationship with the decedent's son if she would not obtain a divorce. The decedent in reliance upon this promise did not institute a divorce proceeding and consequently did not remove the defendant from her will. This representation by its own terms does not relate to an existing or past fact, but instead relates to the defendant's future conduct or action. Therein lies the plaintiff's cause of action for promissory fraud." Id.

  • "The doctrine of promissory fraud has not been adopted in Tennessee, but the Supreme Court made it clear that they were willing to adopt the majority rule pertaining to promissory fraud 'in a proper case where justice demands.' Bolan v. Caballero, [417 S.W.2d 538, 541 (Tenn. 1967]. In addition, the Supreme Court in Fowler v. Happy Goodman Family, [575 S.W.2d 496 (Tenn. 1978)], judged the facts of that case according to the majority rule which is the acknowledgment of promissory fraud. However, the court held that the complainant failed to produce sufficient proof to support its claim for promissory fraud. Id." Id. at 592-93.

  • "As we have noted, promissory fraud can be established by proving a lack of a present intent with regard to a promise of future action. Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc., [608 S.W.2d 585 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1980)]. In order for the plaintiff to demonstrate the lack of present intent or that the statement was false when made, the plaintiff must do so 'by evidence other than subsequent failure to keep the promise or subjective surmise or impression of the promisee.' Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Petty, [664 S.W.2d 77, 81 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983)]." Id.

Other Sources of Note: Ray v. Williams , No. W2000-03000-COA-R3-CV, 2002 WL 974671 (Tenn. Ct. App. May 9, 2002) (affirming finding of promissory fraud).

Recent Cases: Styles v. Blackwood , No. E2007-00416-COA-R3-CV, 2008 WL 5396804 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 29, 2008) (upholding trial court's finding of promissory fraud primarily on basis that trial court is in best position to weigh credibility of witnesses)

After an accident, many injury victims and their families want more information on the accident and their legal rights. Consequently, many of them have found their way to these pages. While we are happy you are here, please understand Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law was written to be a quick, invaluable reference for Tennessee tort lawyers. While the book provides the leading case for more than 300 tort law subjects and thousands of related case citations, it is not a substitute for personalized legal advice from a qualified lawyer.

Rather than researching these legal issues alone, we urge you to contact one of our award-winning lawyers who can sit down with you, review your case, answer your questions and clearly explain your rights and your options in a no-cost, no-obligation consultation. Our experienced attorneys handle all personal injury and wrongful death cases on a contingency basis, so we only get paid if we win. If for any reason you are unable to come to our office, we will gladly come to you.

To schedule an appointment, contact us online or call us at 615-742-4880 or toll-free at 866.812.8787.

The foregoing is an excerpt from Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law, published by John A. Day, Civil Trial Specialist, Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers, recipient of Best Lawyers in America recognition, Martindale-Hubbell AV® Preeminent™ rated attorney, and Top 100 Tennessee Mid-South Super Lawyers designee. Read John’s full bio here.

The book is now available electronically by subscription at The new format allows us to keep the book current as new opinions are released. BirdDog Law also has John's Tennessee Law of Civil Trial and Compendium of Tennessee Tort Reform Statutes available by subscription, as well as multiple free resources to help Tennessee lawyers serve their clients

Client Reviews
Everything was great. You guys are a great representative. I was satisfied with everything. Truly appreciate John Day and his hard-working staff. Jamar Gibson
We thought that you did an excellent job in representing us in our lawsuit. We would recommend you to anyone. Mitch Deese
The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. is, without a doubt, the best in Nashville! They treated me with the utmost respect and tended to my every need. No question went unanswered. I was always kept informed of every step in the process. I received phenomenal results; I couldn't ask for more. I would definitely hire The Law Offices of John Day, P.C. again. Anthony Santiago
I would definitely recommend to anyone to hire John Day's law firm because everyone was helpful, made everything clear and got the job done. I am satisfied with how my case was handled. June Keomahavong
It's been a long battle but this firm has been very efficient and has done a remarkable job for me! I highly recommend them to anyone needing legal assistance. Everyone has always been very kind and kept me informed of all actions promptly. Linda Bush
I had a great experience with the Law Offices of John Day. The staff was very accommodating, and my phone calls/emails were always responded to in a timely manner. They made the entire process very easy and stress-free for me, and I had confidence that my case was in good hands. I am very happy with the results, and I highly recommend! Casey Hutchinson